Gregory Dilg: Without a marriage license, you're not legally married. You have to get the license first. Then you can have a ceremony, and get the actual certificate.
Ruthe Real: 1. You need to sign a marriage license to be legally married2. No, you need to sign a marriage license to be legally married3. Yes
Jonelle Eligio: you need a marriage certificate...or it is not legal : )
Groupon.com es un sitio web gratuito que ofrece descuentos en productos y servicios en áreas locales. Si quieres ganar dinero gratis para utilizarlo en ofertas a través de Groupon, puedes hacerlo refiriendo a un amigo al sitio. Es un proceso bastante fácil.
Determine cuánto dinero tiene en Groupon Bucks. Para ver tu saldo, sólo tienes que iniciar sesión en Groupon como lo harÃas normalmente introduciendo tu correo electrónico y contraseña.
Introduzca la información de su tarjeta de crédito en Groupon. Para ganar dinero gratis refiriendo a un amigo, necesitarás poner una tarjeta de crédito en la configuración de tu cuenta.
Recomiende a un amigo al sitio para ganar $10 en Groupon Bucks. Tenga en cuenta que usted sólo recibe el dinero si el amigo referido compra su primer trato a través de Groupon en un plazo de 72 horas.
Usando las diferentes opc! iones de referencia. Cada una de las cuatro opciones de referencia funciona casi de la misma manera. Cada opción te permite referir a Groupon a un amigo por un potencial de $10 en Groupon Bucks.
RegÃstrese en Groupon.com. Cuando te inscribes en Groupon, puedes buscar ofertas cerca de tu ciudad natal para servicios de belleza, escapadas, restaurantes y otros productos y servicios. Tienes que estar registrado para referir a un amigo a Groupon.
Reconocer las limitaciones de Groupon Bucks. Lee la letra pequeña. Hay ciertas reglas que se aplican a la redención de Groupon Bucks. Son una forma de crédito del sitio. Esto significa que no puede canjearlos por dinero en efectivo; sólo puede canjearlos por compras de Groupon.
Tenga en cuenta las limitaciones. Groupon Bucks puede ser utilizado para cualquier compra que usted haga en Groupon. Si el precio de compra es mayor que la cantidad de su dinero, usted pagará el precio de compra restante.
Rona Ising: Am i wrong to be mad at my husband?
Melvin Nakama: It is good, but tough. worth it probably if you are with the right person
Marita Stadick: I believe 17 is a young age and that you'll still have changes of your perspectives on marriage -- being afraid of it.I've been married for 7 years now and I believe that marriage is a lifetime commitment, it's something that you can't turn your back when you're no longer interested. It's all about acceptance because no matter how long you've been with your spouse (as boyfriend-girlfriend), you'll discover undesirable things / acts / habits that you can either accept (and make a happier marriage) or try to change (and make your marriage in conflict or fail). It's all about responsibility and being selfless because after marriage you're not just concerned with yourself but with your spouse (and children) as well.It's all about decision-making and healthy argument because you will be confronted by situations tha! t require smart decisions and healthy talk / argument with your spouse.And lastly, marriage is something that made my life happier and worthwhile ;)...Show more
Cliff Tyre: I agree that it's ridiculous. I don't see why you (not even related to this child) should pay for her braces when she HAS 2 PARENTS. What is wrong with people? I swear.
Sang Hanafin: I commend you on your action,your husband should be proud of what he got.You are a decent woman with self respect..
Rodrigo Pezley: Leave him and enroll on an on-line classes do something for you and you baby and make something of yourself. Right now they are giving free grant money so that you can attend school and get an Associates degree in anything. That will teach him!
Gale Hartt: How many people with girl yahoo avatars are really girls?
Jules Ashbach: No...I am positive this was not set up. This friend of his is a total loser...no way i was taking that bait. My husband has friends that ! are in the nfl and rappers...why fall for a loser
Pei He! atherly: Leave your sorry *** so-called husband and take everything with you and tell him you want a divorce!!
Phillip Modafferi: Since you are at least 5 years away from the time in your life when you would reasonably contemplate actually getting married.... where you are about it is just fine. At 17, it's probably GOOD that you are afraid of marriage. Right on track, girl.
Ivan Velazquez: if he disrespects you and your family, move on. move on before your son is born. this isn't a man worthy of a game or even a second look.
Renato Abatiell: It is still the best program for society, and best for your kids.I was in a bad one for decades, now I am in a perfect one. It is still the way to go.
Elinore Schlinker: he must have been like that when you married him?? Now you are pregnant and bringing a child into the world you decide to see the light?People amaze me lol
Foster Padgette: Are women allowed to keep the last name of there Ex Husband?
!Antonette Shappy: maybe your husband asked him to check in on you/make sure you were ok while he was gone. i know it sounds stupid my husband does that whenever he leaves town even though he knows i took care of myself for years before he ever came into the picture and i don't need a babysitter! he's just crazy overprotective like that
King Bringle: Are friends with benefits orignally friend?
Donovan Stallons: Your husband is a control fr-eek, he wants you to pay for the his child's braces while you already paying for health care and to stop paying your mom who is the only person helping your rising your child say no to him and stand up for what is right.
Jackson Esmiol: you should be afraid of Marriage, review the subject in five years.
Chet Nozick: I miss alot of school days?
Hilma Pestano: Husband's best friend...am i overreacting?
Piedad Bassiti: Got yourself a real winner don't you? What a f*cking lazy azz SOB!......Sounds like h! e has you right where he wants you....Besides being the father of your ! son....is there ANYTHING positive about this relationship???
Blair Abdi: If he doesn't care, why should you? Leave him, stay with your family, and create a loving environment for your baby without the husband. He doesn't deserve you or the baby.
Mel Crapo: Completely depends on who you're marrying. the MAJORITY of people aren't worth it.
Reginald Maxi: Dont cheat or anything that will really put you in the wrong.like the others said leave him. He will miss you. And realizewhat's at risk. If he continues to act that way, Then leave him for good.
Pam Rampadarat: Ironic? No, this is deceitful and disrespectful. Tell your husband before he finds out by someone else. Sidenote: Do you think this was a set up?
Chris Wilczewski: I love being married. It's great. Every single day, I get to say "I love you" to a woman who cares about me, who supports me, who likes doing things with me. It's like having a best friend who not only lives with you, but wh! o also has sex with you.
Donnie Bolio: It is different for all and it depends on your choice. You are very young and it is wise to get mature advice on the subject. Come here often and you can learn some things about life. Stay away from bad boys and losers.
Nikita Schroepfer: Go to and stay at your family's house until he cares.
Whitley Leopold: The one humans who inform you it is only a bit of paper are folks that have not ever had that piece of paper. The little paper caries colossal commitments of time, cash and legal entanglements. While there are lots of who marry and wish later then had not since of the huge authorized commitments, nevertheless it does matter even at the present time. Additionally a good many positive marriages had survived on account that of the main issue in ending a marriage as an alternative than a pair dwelling together figuring out to separate up. I have known people - myself incorporated, who've found the vigour to work ha! rder at making it work because there used to be no effortless strategy ! to end the sort of dedication. Marriage is yet another level of commitment - it is a choice to make a decision to like and fall in lover time and again with a man or woman who is changing over the years as you too are changing....Show more
Mitzie Clough: I am twenty years old and I am afraid of marriage. I personally do not believe in marriage. It is society's way of saying what is official and what is not. If you love someone, you do not a ring or vows to make it real. And besides, the odds of your marriage becoming a liability exceed 50%.
Particia Thorton: My husband's left to go to Mexico on Sunday. Today his best friend, (that i never talk to other than when he is @ our house visiting my husband or when he calls my cell phone looking for my husband when he doesn't answer his cell phone) sends me a text saying "what are you doing at 3 o'clock?" I thought it was weird for him to ask that so i said "i'm going to work at noon. why?" he responded "I wanted to se! e if you wanted to go to this hibachi restaurant with me" WTF?? How ironic! He's never asked me to go anywhere with him or ever crossed the line until my husband leaves the country??? what should I do?...Show more
Jayson Brod: Why are you worrying about marriage at seventeen?
Coleman Ocegueda: BTW...I told him No as soon as he asked
Oscar Waddups: my husband he disrespects me and my family, and calls me everything but a married women.i am now pregnant 8months and 1 week. i've tried to go to my families house, and his responds,'i dont care!'. i have tried everything that i could possiblythink of. I NEED HELP FAST BEFORE MY SON IS BORN!...Show more
Roselee Mczeal: When mine disrespects me I follow with the comment "Do you feel better now?" Kind of brings him back to the ground.
Dick Baumgarten: You need to leave him. he is acting like a child still and hasn't grown up.it woouldnt be goo for your son to grow up with a father like that because you! rson could get the wrong messages.no guy or husband should disrespect t! heir wives. or any womenyou deserve better.leave him.
Torri Tippey: Money Issues With Husband ?
Jacinta Moitoso: Friend not showing up on person's mutual friends but still has recent connections with them(facebook)?
Peter Lapoint: Marriage has its place in society. The old fashioned family is still the best thing for society, but I think people need to understand the role of each spouse before getting married. Each spouse's expectations of the other should be spelled out. Women do not stay at home anymore. Women have the same stressors that men have when working outside the home. A frank discussion of money and household chores and responsibilities needs to take place prior to getting married and repeated frequently throughout the marriage.Marriage should be a partnership where each person is an individual, yet they are working toward a common goal. One person should not dictate how the house runs, each person should have a voice and an opinion.If yo! u can work all these things out, marriage is great. If you can't work with someone on these things, stay single....Show more
Rashad Marecki: How do you know a friend is a True friend?
Letitia Bigelow: Tell him off, you are married and he is his best friend!! if its going as friends thing then talk to ur hubby about it first
Rona Espalin: Are hot asian girls hotter than any other hot girl of another race?
Davina Shindler: I need a girl friend?
Maria Devenney: Modern day slavery for women. Pointless. It was needed in the olden days when women couldn't support themselves. In modern times it's useless.
Verdie Wollen: My husband is crazy, he is stressing me out to the max. We being married 2yr. I’m 23 he is 32. Well, I work 12hr a day I have being working overtime lately ‘cause we just bought a home, and I bought a new car I’m also going to school full time working on my Master.. Hubby works 8hrs a day as well. However, he doesn’t hel! p me cook, clean do laundry or with our 2yr old. My son stays at my mom! s while I’m at work when I get off I pick him up when I get off around 6pm by the time I make dinner and give him a bath is his bed time. Hubby thinks is not his job to do the house chores, nor take care of our son. Any how, I pay my mom 600 a mo just ‘cause my son stays with her all day and I would be paying as much in daycare. My husband is mad at ‘cause I’m paying my mom. Also, we had a big fight last night just ‘cause I said I wasn’t going to pay for his daughter braces even though she is under my insurance they cover 50% of the braces and the mom should be paying the other 50% but her sorry mom refused and I told my husband I can’t offer to pay it all and if he could step in let it be. And I know my husband doesn’t want step in ‘cause that will mean him taking back his car or not paying his credit cards, so he wants me to spend my savings which ridicules. I said no and now he is saying that I don’t’ care for his daughter like I care for our son a! nd that I shouldn’t be paying my mom for watching our kid....Show more
Graduarse de la escuela secundaria temprano puede ser un proceso emocionante y desafiante. Hay muchas opciones disponibles para los estudiantes de preparatoria que esperan graduarse con anticipación. Con un poco de investigación y planificación cuidadosa, usted puede elegir el mejor programa para ayudarle a graduarse temprano y alcanzar su próximo conjunto de metas!
Averigüe si necesita un cierto número de créditos. Su elegibilidad para graduarse temprano dependerá de las reglas de su escuela y del distrito local. Por ejemplo, algunas escuelas requieren un cierto número de créditos para graduarse. Pregúntele a su consejero si esto es cierto para su distrito y, de ser asÃ, averigüe cuántos créditos necesitará para graduarse.
InscrÃbase en la escuela secundaria en lÃnea. Asistir a la escuela secundaria tradicional toma mucho tiempo que no ne! cesariamente se utiliza para el tiempo real de clase. Por ejemplo, toma tiempo cambiar de clase, almorzar, asistir a las asambleas escolares y trabajar con tantos otros estudiantes. Asistir a una escuela secundaria en lÃnea puede permitirle hacer más trabajo en la misma cantidad de tiempo que pasa en la escuela regular.
PÃdale a sus maestros cartas de recomendación. Para obtener la aceptación en los programas de graduación acelerada (y también en la universidad), muchos equipos de admisión requieren cartas de recomendación de sus maestros, mentores o entrenadores. Asegúrese de pedirlos antes de salir de su escuela secundaria actual.
Haga arreglos financieros. Graduarse temprano puede ser costoso si se inscribe en programas de graduación temprana que son independientes de su escuela secundaria. No sólo los programas cuestan dinero, sino que los materiales de aprendizaje (como los libros de texto) y el transporte (como un autobús escolar) no suelen es! tar incluidos.
Visite los colegios comunitarios locales.! Los colegios comunitarios son locales y proporcionan un gran paso entre la escuela secundaria y la universidad. Muchos colegios comunitarios ofrecen programas de graduación temprana además de los cursos universitarios que contarán como crédito tanto para la escuela secundaria como para la universidad.
Busque cursos electivos de la comunidad. Algunas comunidades ofrecen clases públicas por las noches, los fines de semana y durante el verano que pueden cumplir con las materias optativas de la escuela secundaria necesarias para la graduación. Asegúrese de verificar que su escuela secundaria reconozca estas clases para la graduación antes de inscribirse.
Investigue los programas de educación en el hogar para que pueda trabajar a su propio ritmo. Si usted aprende mejor en un ambiente aislado, la educación en el hogar es otra opción que podrÃa ayudarle a graduarse temprano. Usted puede hacer la educación en el hogar durante toda la escuela secundaria, o ! cambiar a la educación en el hogar para acelerar su graduación.
Hable con su consejero o director. Graduarse temprano es una decisión importante. Asegúrese de hablar con su consejero o director para asegurarse de que graduarse temprano es lo correcto para usted.
Consigue algunas copias de tus transcripciones. Para calificar para los programas de graduación acelerada fuera de su escuela secundaria, es probable que los equipos de admisión le pidan que proporcione los registros de los estudiantes para su revisión. También deberá enviar copias de los expedientes académicos junto con las solicitudes de ingreso a la universidad. Asegúrese de pedirle a su escuela secundaria que le proporcione 3 ó 4 copias de su expediente académico.
Toma tu GED. El GED es el equivalente a tu diploma de secundaria. Todo lo que necesitas hacer para obtenerlo es pasar el examen, que requiere un poco de estudio. Las clases de estudio de GED (tanto en lÃnea como en perso! na) están ampliamente disponibles, pero no deben ser tomadas en lugar ! de las clases reales de la escuela secundaria (si es posible) porque usted podrÃa perderse una preparación importante para la universidad.
Habla con tus padres. Antes de tomar una decisión definitiva sobre la graduación anticipada, asegúrate de hablar con tus padres o tutores. Para poder graduarse temprano, es posible que tenga que asistir a cursos en lÃnea, iniciar un programa de educación en el hogar o inscribirse en un colegio comunitario.
Asegúrese de que sus créditos de la escuela secundaria se traduzcan en un diploma de la escuela secundaria. Antes de inscribirse en un programa de graduación temprana, asegúrese de que los cursos que está tomando resulten en un diploma acreditado de escuela secundaria. Si no está seguro, simplemente pregunte al personal de inscripción del programa. Sin un diploma acreditado de la escuela secundaria, usted no será considerado un graduado de la escuela secundaria.
Determine si necesita aprobar un examen p! ara graduarse. Algunas escuelas pueden requerir que usted pase una prueba de graduación. Además, es posible que usted no sea elegible para tomar el examen hasta que haya tenido por lo menos dos años de escuela secundaria. Pregunte a su consejero escolar si su escuela o distrito requiere que usted tome un examen, y averigüe cuáles son los requisitos previos para tomar el examen.
Pregunte a las posibles universidades. Algunas universidades tienen pautas de solicitud adicionales que requieren que los posibles estudiantes se reúnan para ser considerados para la admisión. Verifica con las universidades en las que estás interesado para asegurarte de que cumples con todos sus criterios de graduación temprana.
Analice su horario de trabajo y de actividades extracurriculares. Graduarse temprano probablemente requerirá un aumento importante en su carga de estudio y tareas. Esto significa que es posible que no tenga tanto tiempo para el trabajo o las actividades ! extracurriculares como el que tenÃa en la escuela secundaria normal. A! segúrese de que menos trabajo y juego encajen en sus metas financieras, recreativas y sociales.
InscrÃbete en los cursos de verano de tu escuela secundaria. El verano es un buen momento para tomar clases adicionales si tu escuela secundaria ofrece programas de verano. Al inscribirse en la escuela de verano por dos o tres veranos consecutivos, es probable que acumule suficientes créditos para graduarse de la escuela secundaria hasta un año antes de lo previsto.
No te pierdas los exámenes de ingreso a la universidad. Muchas escuelas secundarias ofrecen exámenes de ingreso a la universidad como los SAT y los ACT en momentos especÃficos a lo largo del año escolar. También ofrecen importantes cursos de preparación para el examen. Si usted planea asistir a la universidad, necesitará tomar estos exámenes sin importar su estado de graduación temprana.
Determine qué clases necesita todavÃa. Si su consejero o director está de acuerdo en que usted se ! gradúe temprano, pregunte qué clases necesita tomar para graduarse. También puede pedir consejo sobre cómo terminar esas clases dentro de su horario designado.
p>L’herbe de mille-pattes est un excellent choix de gazon, surtout si vous vivez dans une région plus chaude comme le Sud. Il est peu coûteux, pousse facilement dans un sol pauvre et nécessite très peu d’entretien ! Les méthodes les plus populaires pour planter le mille-pattes sont la semence, le gazon en plaques et les mottes de gazon, et elles ont chacune un prix et un niveau de travail différents. Après avoir planté votre gazon, vous n’aurez plus à vous soucier de l’entretien, puisqu’il n’a besoin que d’un minimum de soins pour rester beau et en santé.
Utilisez un épandeur pour recouvrir la zone d’engrais riche en azote. La tourbe a besoin d’éléments nutritifs supplémentaires pour s’établir, il est donc important de conditionner la couche supérieure du sol. Marchez l’épandeur en lignes! droites et régulières et déposez 20 lb (9,1 kg) d’engrais de démarrage 5-10-5 pour chaque 1 000 pieds carrés (93 m) de pelouse.
Décalez les morceaux de gazon de façon à ce qu’ils forment un réseau plus solide. Posez la tourbe directement sur le sol comme vous poseriez des briques, en longues rangées avec les joints en quinconce. Vous pouvez également utiliser un couteau pour couper les morceaux en deux, puis alterner entre les morceaux longs et courts pour créer un effet plus décalé.
Évitez de marcher sur l’herbe pendant les 3 premières semaines. Pendant que l’herbe pousse et développe son système racinaire, laissez-la aussi intacte que possible. Faites savoir aux membres de la famille ou aux visiteurs qu’il ne faut pas marcher sur l’herbe pendant qu’elle est encore neuve.
Tondez votre mille-pattes à une hauteur de 2,5 à 5,1 cm (1 à 2 po). En général, vous devriez essayer de garder votre mille-pattes à 1 po (2,5 cm). ! Cependant, si vous voyez du cuir chevelu dans certaines zones,! vous pouvez augmenter la hauteur à 1,5 à 2 po (3,8 à 5,1 cm), mais jamais plus de 2 po (5,1 cm).
Utilisez un râteau ou un rouleau pour niveler le sol. Poussez le sol ameubli autour de la zone jusqu’à ce qu’il soit à niveau. Cela assurera un bon contact entre la semence et le sol et aidera l’herbe à pousser uniformément.
Arrosez bien l’herbe pendant 3 semaines pour qu’elle puisse former des racines solides. L’herbe aura besoin de beaucoup d’eau pour ses premières semaines de formation, en commençant juste après que vous ayez fini de planter. Donnez-lui un arrosage sain, et gardez-le bien arrosé tous les jours jusqu’à ce que les 3 semaines soient écoulées.
Assurez-vous qu’il n’y a pas d’autre gazon dans la zone. Si vous replantez une pelouse existante, arrachez l’herbe existante à l’aide d’une débroussailleuse ou appliquez un herbicide non sélectif sur toute la surface. Couvrez la zone avec une barrière photoé! lectrique, telle qu’une bâche, et attendez 2 à 4 semaines. Cela tuera la vieille herbe et l’empêchera de se rétablir lorsque vous planterez le mille-pattes.
Insérez l’herbe à l’aide d’un foret à bouchons de gazon si vous utilisez des bouchons. Percez directement dans le sol en gardant environ 0,30 m (1 pi) d’espace entre chaque bouchon. Les tampons d’herbe atteindront environ 5,1 cm (2 po) dans le sol.
Travail du sol sur toute la surface pour améliorer la qualité du sol. Immédiatement après avoir déposé l’engrais riche en azote, passer le motoculteur sur la zone pour mélanger et aérer le sol. Combinez l’engrais avec le sol en labourant les 5 pouces (13 cm) supérieurs du sol.
Utilisez des graines ou des bouchons pour un coût moindre, mais plus de main d’Å"uvre. Les semences et les tampons de gazon multicotylédones sont extrêmement peu coûteux, ce qui en fait deux options attrayantes. Cependant, comme vous repartirez Ã! zéro, vous devrez faire beaucoup de travail pour vous assurer que lâ! €™herbe est bien établie.
Poser la tourbe de façon à ce que les bords se touchent mais ne se chevauchent pas. Cela empêchera les bords de sécher et les coutures de se voir dans la pelouse. Les morceaux de gazon s’assembleront aussi plus proprement.
Ne marchez pas sur le gazon en plaque pendant un mois pour lui donner le temps de se calmer. Évitez de déranger la tourbe pendant qu’elle pousse ensemble et forme des racines. Vous pouvez soit attacher le terrain à l’aide d’une corde, soit faire savoir aux membres de la famille qu’ils devront rester à l’écart de l’herbe jusqu’à ce qu’elle soit suffisamment saine et solide pour qu’on puisse y marcher dessus.
Épandez l’herbe sur la surface à l’aide d’un épandeur si vous utilisez de la semence. Versez la semence dans l’épandeur et faites le tour de la zone en rangées régulières. En général, vous devriez épandre une livre (0,45 kg) de graines de mille-pattes par 3 000! pieds carrés (280 m) de sol. Cependant, cette mesure peut varier en fonction de votre emplacement et du climat, alors suivez toujours les instructions fournies avec la semence de gazon.
Jusqu’à l’endroit où vous planterez l’herbe. Utilisez un motoculteur et travaillez en lignes droites et régulières pour aérer et aérer le sol. Travaillez à une profondeur d’environ 5 pouces (13 cm) pour améliorer la qualité de votre sol.
Choisissez cette méthode si vous voulez payer plus pour moins de travail. Le gazon en plaques est l’option la plus coûteuse, mais c’est aussi la plus rapide et la plus facile. Si vous êtes à la recherche d’une pelouse rapide et peu exigeante en main-d’Å"uvre, c’est votre meilleure option.
N’arrosez l’herbe que lorsqu’elle a l’air fanée ou qu’elle perd de sa couleur. Le mille-pattes n’a besoin d’être arrosé que pendant la sécheresse, lorsqu’il commence à montrer des signes de stress hydri! que. Si vous remarquez ces qualités, arrosez-les en profondeur une foi! s par semaine.
Arrosez bien la tourbe pendant 3-4 semaines. Commencez à arroser juste après avoir posé et roulé la tourbe, et continuez à bien l’arroser pendant le premier mois environ pendant qu’elle s’enracine. L’arrosage quotidien, de préférence le matin, favorise également la sédimentation et l’adhérence du sol.
Épandez un engrais riche en azote sur votre gazon deux fois par an. Vous devrez appliquer l’engrais une fois au printemps et une fois à l’automne. Veillez à appliquer légèrement une fine couche d’engrais, car trop d’engrais peut endommager l’herbe. N’utiliser qu’une livre (0,45 kg) par 1 000 pieds carrés (93 m) de terre chaque fois que vous l’appliquez.
Enlevez tout le gazon existant dans la zone. Si vous replantez une pelouse existante, vous devrez tuer la vieille herbe en appliquant un herbicide ou en l’arrachant avec un coupeur de gazon. Ensuite, recouvrez le sol d’une barrière légère, telle q! u’une bâche, pendant 2 à 4 semaines.
Elissa Curlin: Here is one. Does it look familiar? The numbers are the generations and the "+" are the spouses. For example, Adolphus there married Elizabeth White, and their first son was Amos.1 Adolphus Wakefield STONE , C.S.A b: Sep 1842 d: 6 Jun 1910__+ Elizabeth Jane WHITE b: 1838 d: 1872/1873____2 Amos STONE b: 29 Aug 1867 d: 26 Jun 1933______+ Emily SMILEY b: 30 Dec 1875________3 Lelia Ruth STONE b: 12 Nov 1894 d: WFT Est. 1895-1988________3 Amos STONE b: 28 Jan 1896 d: WFT Est. 1897-1986________3 Willie Monroe STONE b: 29 Sep 1898 d: WFT Est. 1899-1988________3 Rance Cole STONE b: 10 Sep 1900 d: Dec 1966__________+ Belze ABERNATHY b: 20 Nov 1910 d: 8 Aug 1996____________4 Living STONE______________+ Living TINSLEY____________4 Living STONE______________+ Living COMPTON________________5 Living COMPTON__________________+ Living TURNER____________________6 Living TURNER______________________+ Living AULGUR____________4 Living STONE______________+ Living JONES________! 3 George Cousin STONE , Sr. b: 5 Aug 1902 d: Sep 1975__________+ Mami Elizabeth DAVIS b: 27 Jan 1910 d: 1967____________4 George Cousin STONE , Jr. b: ABT 1929________3 Raymond D STONE b: 23 Nov 1904 d: 8 Jan 1977__________+ Daisey Inez FORMAN b: 4 Jun 1904 d: 15 Apr 1989____________4 Desmond Wayne STONE b: ABT 1926____________4 Mavis Rae STONE b: ABT 1928________3 Annie Francis STONE b: ABT 1906________3 Ermon D STONE b: 26 May 1909 d: Jan 1984________3 Mildred Ozell STONE b: ABT 1911________3 Jack STONE b: 8 Sep 1918 d: 30 Mar 1992__________+ Pat BROOKS b: ABT 1920____2 Virginia STONE b: 1868 d: WFT Est. 1869-1962____2 Dora Ann Elizabeth STONE b: 29 Feb 1872 d: 16 Mar 1939______+ Isaac Melton DENTON b: 14 Sep 1869 d: 21 Jul 1933________3 Roscoe Alexander DENTON b: 29 Mar 1889 d: 29 Sep 1976__________+ Betty Fay WHITE b: ABT 1894____________4 Opal Fay DENTON b: ABT 1913______________+ FNU MOORE b: ABT 1911________________5 Living MOORE__________________+ Living WALKER_____! _______4 Melton Orlander DENTON b: ABT 1915______________+ FNU! MOORE b: ABT 1917____________4 Living DENTON______________+ Willie Archie HALEY b: 20 Feb 1933 d: 30 Dec 1989________________5 Living HALEY__________________+ Living WADLE________________5 Living HALEY__________________+ Living COTTON____________________6 Living COTTON______________________+ Living MURPHEY______________________+ Living RUNNELS________3 Lessie Elizabeth DENTON b: 19 Jun 1891 d: 10 Aug 1981__________+ Sam Allen TACKER b: 12 Jul 1890 d: 19 May 1966____________4 Carlton Allen TACKER b: ABT 1909____________4 Altha Mae TACKER b: ABT 1911____________4 Acie Melton TACKER b: ABT 1913____________4 Zulia Elizabeth TACKER b: ABT 1915____________4 Victor Owen Allen TACKER b: ABT 1917________3 Bertie James DENTON b: 23 Aug 1894 d: 25 May 1957__________+ Josie Leona CLEMMONS b: 14 Feb 1904 d: 6 Sep 1988________3 Walter Bryant DENTON b: 22 Aug 1896 d: 22 Feb 1967__________+ Elnora Eluzabeth OGDEN b: 28 Nov 1904 d: 2 Nov 1991____________4 Meriem Frances DENTON b: ABT 1925_! ___________4 Maxine DENTON b: ABT 1927____________4 Jack Max DENTON b: ABT 1929________3 John Thomas DENTON b: ABT 1898__________+ Fannie Lee ABLES b: 24 Sep 1900 d: 19 Nov 1994____________4 Shirley Lee DENTON b: ABT 1922____________4 Dorothy Jean DENTON b: ABT 1924____________4 Mary Sue DENTON b: ABT 1926________3 Laura Ann DENTON b: 16 Aug 1901 d: 14 Apr 1990__________+ Wesley Dee STONE b: ABT 1899____________4 Lillia Almeta STONE b: ABT 1923________3 William Odes DENTON b: 18 Dec 1903 d: 19 May 1974__________+ Ima Mae CLEMMONS b: 25 Sep 1908 d: 25 Mar 1985________3 Fletcher Winston DENTON b: 27 Jul 1907 d: 11 May 1987__________+ Tiny Vedria SEGLER b: 29 Jul 1907 d: 14 Dec 1977____________4 Pasy Ruth DENTON b: ABT 1928________3 Lee Howard DENTON b: 27 Apr 1911 d: 12 Oct 1978__________+ Julia Mae JORDAN b: ABT 1913...Show more
Myron Leftwich: Well if you want to know then start researching..............not everyone who is called one surname is related, so if you are ! searcing for 'research' already done you will have no idea if they belo! ng to you or not or if the person has just copied and pasted collecting names together if there is no cited sources ( which is generally the case)Start with the known (YOU) and work back to the unknown ( your ancestors) using records you already have at home and in the homes of all your living relations, ask about family stories and cite and document everything this website will help http://familytimeline.webs.com/recordsinyourownhom... and should get you back 3-5 generations where you then know your family and know who and where you are looking...the links page will then help more...........................Show more
Arnette Dominici: On RootsWeb's WorldConnect Project Global Search, I got 489.604 results when I searched on the surname Stone. Maybe some of those will be related to you maybe the won’t. http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op...Generally, people have to research their own family history to have an accurate family tree because there is not j! ust one Stone family and all Stones are not related.There is an excellent tutorial for those who are new to family research at http://rwguide.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ; everyone starting out in genealogy should understand the basics and this tutorial covers them. After you complete the tutorial, if you are interested in researching your ancestors, post another question for help on how to get started....Show more
Son Ahlers: There are thousands of Stones in the passengers from England and Scotland. There are 40,000 Stones in the 1880 US census, many born in the US, as were their parents. There are over 800,000 trees with Stones on ancestry.com. There is no one Stone family tree.
Entra en Moshi Monsters. Para empezar, simplemente introduzca su nombre de usuario y contraseña en la casilla. Si tienes un código de Arby/Mopod, ponlo también!
Después de completar el DesafÃo Diario, juega a Hall of Puzzles. Cada rompecabezas te da cinco Rox.
La Discoteca Underground es otra opción. Sin embargo, se limita a los miembros solamente. Puede ser un juego divertido si tocas tus canciones favoritas.
Otros minijuegos como Flutterby Field y En-Gen son buenos. Lo único es que esos juegos requieren mucho trabajo para atrapar a Rox. También puedes obtener 200-300 Rox si vas al puerto pero tienes que ser miembro para ir y hacer clic en los árboles todos los dÃas para obtener Rox!
Juega al Daily Challenge. Sólo tienes que hacer clic en el mapa y luego ir al Puzzle Palace. El Palacio de los Rompe! cabezas se asemeja a un castillo con diamantes.
Juega al juego «Moshling Boshling». Ve a tu mapa y haz clic en Main Street. ¿Ves a la pareja comiendo? Haz clic en su cesta que tiene a Boshlings robando los pasteles y puedes empezar a jugar. Juega todo lo que quieras. Para facilitarte las cosas, sólo tienes que jugar el primer nivel una y otra vez hasta que veas un letrero que diga que has llegado al lÃmite de Rox.
Lauri Ohl: production of technologies requires factories which release harmful effluents into the atmosphere thus damaging environment.
Lou Ravelo: It doesn't. It helps you.Feel free to move into a cave and eat bugs and grass.
Filiberto Ranalli: AIR POLUTION
Jeannetta Gaffigan: Technology negatively affects the environment by compromising human health and safety, endangering natural ecosystems and biodiversity, having a cumulative impact on global systems, and depleting natural resources. Technology positively affects the environment through the application of environmental science to solve problems caused by human environmental impact
Jess Grizzel: Nuclear power is a good example of how technology damages our environment. http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/japanese-milita...As a result Japanese sewage is now radioactive. http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/07/japanese-milita...So is the ocean. http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/01_01.html
Ninfa! Aronica: Much new technology benefits our environment. This includes technology which uses energy more efficiently, such as compact fluorescent lights and diesel engines, and other technology enables us to produce energy without the combustion of hydrocarbons, such as solar and nuclear power.
Isreal Kochheiser: It hasn't.
Season Confalone: Yes it would if you are not divorced legally, it would also be fraud.
Ninfa Asby: as long as you are legally married, for a period of 2 years, you can get your citizenship or green card. the green card is temporary for the first 2 years, after that you can get your citizenship, and a divorce and stay in this country. it is none of there Business if you live with each other. theres a hundred ways to get around that. but you must stay married 2 years.
La grava es un tipo popular de sustrato que puede ser añadido al fondo de su pecera. Si usted planea en agregar la grava a su tanque, es importante lavar la grava para quitar el polvo y otras imperfecciones que podrÃan nublar su agua del tanque de los pescados o hacer sus pescados enfermos. Para lavar su grava, enjuáguela varias veces con agua frÃa y añada un agente desclorante antes de incorporarla al ambiente de su tanque. Nunca use jabón u otros productos de limpieza porque los productos quÃmicos podrÃan ser perjudiciales para los peces.
Vierta el agua y repita el proceso de enjuague 3 veces. Volcar el cubo y vaciar el agua mientras se mantiene la grava en el cubo. Luego, rellene el cubo, déjelo reposar y vuelva a verter el agua. Esto asegurará que todas las partÃculas sueltas salgan de la grava.
Vierta la grava en el agua y déjela en rem! ojo durante 20 minutos. Introduzca la grava en el agua lentamente para que no salpique. Durante este tiempo, el producto quÃmico desclorante eliminará el cloro nocivo de la grava.
Enjuague 1 libra (450 g) de la grava en un colador. Pase la grava por un colador. Use el grifo o una manguera para enjuagarlo. Continúe enjuagando la grava en el colador hasta que el agua salga clara. Luego, tome la grava colada y colóquela en un cubo seco diferente.
Limpie la grava con un kit de sifón dos veces al mes. Un kit de sifón, o limpiador de grava, parece un tubo transparente con una manguera conectada a él. Coloque el tubo transparente en el agua y ponga la manguera en un cubo. Agite el tubo de plástico hacia arriba y hacia abajo para comenzar a desviar el agua y sumerja el extremo del tubo transparente en la grava misma. La grava debe permanecer pegada en el tubo hasta que usted ponga su mano en el extremo de la manguera, lo cual la liberará. Esto desviará la suci! edad y los desechos de los peces a través del tubo mientras m! antiene la grava en el fondo del tanque.
Coloque rocas y plantas sobre la grava para darle un hábitat a sus peces. Anclar las plantas en la grava para que no floten a la superficie. Usted puede colocar las rocas en el fondo del tanque de la manera que usted piensa que se ve mejor. Agregue otras cosas como figuras de madera o de peces para darle más personalidad a su tanque.
Deje la grava en remojo durante 5 minutos. Remojar la grava hará que el polvo y la suciedad suban a la parte superior del agua y hará que el agua sea turbia y gris. A medida que continúe el proceso de enjuague, el agua deberÃa empezar a ser más clara.
Llenar un cubo con agua y añadir el producto quÃmico desclorante. Llene el cubo con 2-3 US gal (7,600-11,400 ml) de agua y luego vierta el producto quÃmico declorado en el agua. Remueva el agua en el cubo para mezclarla.
Llene el cubo con agua frÃa y enjuague la grava. El agua debe subir por encima de la grava alrededor de! 1 pulgada (2,5 cm). Agite el cubo de un lado a otro para agitar el agua y enjuagar la grava.
Lea las instrucciones de su producto quÃmico desclorante. Compre agua desclorada en lÃnea o en una tienda de mascotas. Lea detenidamente las instrucciones para saber qué cantidad de producto quÃmico necesita añadir al agua.
Llene un cubo de 19.000 ml (5 US gal) con la grava. Abra la bolsa de grava y viértala en un cubo. Sólo enjuague 5 libras (2.3 kg) de grava a la vez. Si necesita limpiar más de 5 libras (2.3 kg) de grava a la vez, limpie la grava en lotes separados.
Escurrir la grava a través de un colador. Saque la grava del cubo y colóquela en un colador para filtrar el agua desclorada. Una vez colada, vierta la grava en otro cubo seco.
Agregue una capa de grava de 1,3 cm de grosor en el fondo de su pecera. Ponga suavemente la grava en el fondo del tanque para que no raye ni dañe el tanque de peces. Alise la grava con las manos para que quede ! una capa uniforme.
Compre grava para acuarios en lÃnea o en una ! tienda de mascotas. La grava del tanque de los pescados viene en diversos colores, formas, y tamaños. Compre grava que sea lo suficientemente grande y gruesa para permitir el flujo de agua, pero lo suficientemente fina para promover el crecimiento de bacterias útiles.
Travis Sherrock: http://www.drroyspencer.com/
Tawny Grosskreutz: Libs want it both ways. No snow means global warming, record snows and record cold means global warming. No evidence of global warming means global warming.Its been working for them so far, but people are getting wise to the lies.
Inez Relihan: I'm proud of you for looking to get educated regardless of who you vote for.
Coleman Senn: so less than a degree in 150 years is like a crisis lol
Luis Farlow: You're barking up the wrong tree already. But go ahead. Its your vote. Just thought I throw my two cents in.
Chris Wilczewski: Precipitation comes from water vapor out of the ocean. Warmer tempertures mean more water vapor. In the Summer this is rain, in the winter this is snow.
Reginald Maxi: If you are not supposed to get snow and you do, its global warming. If you are supposed to get snow and you don't, its global warming. If you are not supposed to get snow and you don'! t, its global warming. If you are supposed to get snow and you do, its anomalous.Hope this clears it up for you :
Georgianna Zollo: I lived in South Texas for a while on the coast . Most don't even consider it . People think that Texas is totally a Red Neck Red State but that is not true at all . Austin has some of the nicest Liberals that I have ever met .
Ellis Cellar: I think the snow that began in Copenhagen at the climate summit and has liberally blessed our nation ever since is God checking in with HIS opinion of global warming.
Dorethea Beaston: Romney and bain Capital saved 86% of the business they bought... That is a record batting average of 861... A great record by any measure...Here is Barry's record....Obama spent 535 million on Solyndra and all he got was a lousy T shirt... Which is a lot more than We the tax payer who footed the bill will ever get…Obama makes it look easy to throw others money away on hunch bets... He grabs a few hundre! d Million a day and says. “Call my bookie I want to bet on X! YZ Green to win in the Fifth at the GO Green Piece Track in Intercourse PA.…†And the hunch bet goes through to yet another loss of taxpayer Money… Has he learned from his mistakes? (Bets) No WAY! He says he needs to Double Down, spoken like a man with a HUGE Gambling AddictionDid you know there was more than a dozen more Hunch bets that Obama made with our tax dollars that have went belly up? No? Ohhhhhhhh Yeah....~~~*******~~~ 6.5 Billion American tax dollars pi$$ed away.... We need to send Obama Home on November 6th… ~~~*******~~~http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/13/cbs-obama-ad...This doesn't even include the 2.3 billion he GAVE to the dictator Chavez to drill for oil in the Gulf Of Mexico that he denied Americans to drill for... Ohhh By The Way.. Chavez now sells that oil we paid for to Communist China NOT America... Taxpayers were BONED again by the neophyte Obama...WE are headed into an Anarchy Depression™ Like Italy and Greece and Obama plays Golf a! nd fund raises... WTF.... Do your F-ING JOB OBAMA....Ohhh and the Chevy Volt that costs $44,000.00 and has a road life of 3 years of battery life... Replacement value of batteries is around $2,500.00 and another Environmental disaster of what to do with all those cancer causing batteries... WHAT A DEAL....Barry's batting record is -2TRILLION dollars from his OBAMA CARE TAX RAISE.......Show more
Kenneth Thuesen: 1. They had a contract which guaranteed them fees regardless of any success they might have. Either way they got their fees.2. No. They make the most money by off-shoring jobs. How can this possibly be good when so many Americans are unemployed? because of this the unemployment rate is now the worst in your entire lifetime. If you are not the 1% wealthy you are voting against your own self-interest if you vote for Gov. Romney....Show more
Davida Gisriel: one weather system displaces the other dumbo! When something is not where it should be it pushes the! other weather system into a different/unexpected region.Therefore, you! need to read a book & stop watching Fox Snooze. What a loser. In the meantime, US Southwest is undergoing the biggest drought in history and there is no snow in Winter Olympics....Show more
Stan Conley: spoken like a true nut job. Nobody is seceding dupe, its the thought.Like maybe you should have one. Put down the doobie Penn Boy!
Angelyn Ducas: 1 asset striping and job destruction2 vulture capitalism 3 he is a tax cheat4 flip flop5 outsource of jobsvote for him to destroy America...Show more
Fermin Tara: I think that people have a romanticized view of the US Civil War which omits the years of political maneuvering and exhausting of the system before the first shots were fired. No, I think we haven't exhausted the system and that comes first.Of course, I also do not live in Texas, just the South. I wonder if the secessionists have considered the federal dollars and US companies there....Show more
Gene Debell: No, but you have to argue with people! at the level they can understand. These people are using the snow in the Southeast as "proof" that Climate Change is a "fraud". By the way, a Republican pollster, Frank Luntz, promoted the use of "Climate Change" because it sounded less scary.
Lia Argall: Liberals don't own guns.And resistance to tyranny never goes out of style.
Derrick Kloke: And I'll bet you ignored it when HUSSEIN 0bama (your messiah) said the US has 57 states right?
Raelene Cunnick: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Cl...
Sang Hanafin: You should do something about that Alzheimers Ronald.
Hilde Heskett: Global warming is a fact, learn to read and you can do the research for yourself.
Nona Lentini: Firstly....Texas isn't going to secede...that is just drive by media dribble that gets headlines...they want to ostracize Governor Perry for the comments he made so they are whooping up a storm to shame him for President Obama.But regarding practicality? I thi! nk it is very practical...a huge amount of the nations resources are in! Texas.....Texas has both good gold reserves...and massive amounts of energy...oil...nuclear...LNG...Texas is one of the few states that is well off through this economic mess because fiscal conservatives have been in charge there for a long time and they are not dealing with the spend happy budget problems like California and New York....I think realistically with the energy reserves...the natural resources....and the amount of manafacturing that is in Texas...they would have no problem at all being sustainable....the question is whether or not America could survive without Texas...a huge amount of Federal Revenue comes from the taxation of oil reserves there and the large amount of wealth in the state....it is one of the most industrious states in the Union right up there with California ony difference as I said is that they don't spend every single dollar they have.Texas seccesion...totally plausible...will they do it? Not right now anyway....Of all the states in America! that would hurt the US the most right now...it would be Texas....California has huge wealth from Silicon Valley...but the State Government is dead weight....California has a 40 39 Billion dollar budget shorfall and The Govenator is begging Obama for Stimulus funds in a sort of State Bail Out.....But Texas gas taxes, income taxes...business taxes....and the amount of energy that they produce for the rest of the nation...it would not be a good thing if they left.......Show more
Reyes Brunell: well put tags
Alexandria Popik: Bill Clinton said Romney did "sterling work" while at Bain Capital and yet Obama says he outsourced, bankrupted, and shut down businesses. Somebody is lying. I wonder which one is? Oh wait, Politico says Obama is. Now ain't that a hoot! Obama lying? Who would have thought it?
Ginny Trickett: BTW, I admire Texan patriotism, but this is just insanity. The world is demoralizing faster than I anticipated...
Kaley Lappas: No, you ! are "not understanding this right."
Raye Tredennick: Your absolute! ly right.. That Texas governor was stupid for saying that if federal spending gets any more out of control they should secede. I find that a little bit ridiculous considering the bush administration ran the federal debt up more than anybody else in history, was in office for more than eight years, and you didn't hear a peep from the texas governor. THen all of a sudden you get a democrat in office and not even a hundred days after iinauguration the texas governor starts bitching....Show more
Salvador Prchlik: Laugh all you want. The weather is changing and not for the better. I don't know what the answer is, or even if there is one. Hating Obama and Gore, won't solve anything.
Rena Pepe: Texas is a donor state. More money and military personnel flow out of Texas then into it. They have the businesses, infrastructure, and population to make it as their own country.Liberal states never seceded from the US because they are generally not as self reliant.
! Charissa Riley: I think you may need a science class. Because if you think that decades of dumping whatever we wanted into the air and rivers, combined with cutting down rainforests, polluting our oceans to the tune of a miles-wide trash whirlpool in the Pacific, detonating above and underground nuclear weapons, miles of dead and dying coral reefs, loss of plant and animal species, the opening of artic sea lanes in the winter ...are all naturally occurring and normal, then I need some of what you are smoking. Warming would lead to hotter temperatures in the northern areas (like where those pesky ice caps are) and put more moisture in the air, and Yes, in winter that moisture would be dumped farther south and east as the jet stream takes it around...SO follow me here...No snow in Vancouver....lots of snow in Virginia......nah that won't happen......Remember when we were told that there was no proof that cigarettes caused cancer? Do you still believe that corporate spin too?! ....Because what you are saying is....everything is "normal" nothing we ! do or have ever done effects this planet.....Stop playing "partisan roulette" and open your eyes.Edit: Sorry your question is now voided..you sourced the Daily Mail. You do know its a TABLOID newspaper right?...Show more
Idell Dufort: the whole thing is stupid.... i've heard both sides, and no matter how much texans think they can do it on their own, they can't.you can list out all the "we have this, we have that's", but sometimes what is written does not come to pass in real life.btw, i live in dallas.........Show more
Alexander Villas: Ok, I'm neither liberal nor conservative, but seriously, liberal states never seceded from the US during Bush. Why should Texas be any different? I see no benefits doing this, unless I was a Texan. After observing both you liberals and conservatives up to this point, you are all nut jobs, or so to speak....Show more
Leif Andreason: Your question answers itself.
Alise Rutgers: That's great. You'll fit right in here a! t Y/A Politics.
Sylvie Snetting:
Booker Warlick: I am undecided but now im leaning more towards Mitt Romney. However I still have a questions about his career at Bain Capital.1.How did Romney and Bain Capital make money when the companies they invested in went bankrupt?Ex: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvi6YI03_Ng
Faustino Mellerson: No, you're not. Snow, a lot, a little, makes no difference.... IT'S WINTER!!!!It has to do with temperature averages over decades. That is warming up. It doesn't mean the end of winter as we know it.
Antonette Shappy: that's no longer approximately secession- the bill would not advise isolating from u . s ., yet particularly seeks to make clean the relationship between the State of Texas and the U. S. government in line with the 10th ammendment to the U. S. shape. needless to say, the Fed government. will combat any obstacles on potential the teeth and nail, yet different states are additionally probably to push f! or greater autonomy from increasing federal administration regarding su! ccession- from wiki In its 1868 determination in Texas v. White, u . s . splendid court docket ruled that secession of Texas from u . s . became unlawful, writing "The shape, in all its provisions, seems to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States."...Show more
Moises Rupinski: What are we going to talk about now that the debunking of GW came to a head today? Lead scientist in the global warming scam, Phil Jones, today admitted that there had been no global warming for 15 years and that the warmest year was back in 1995.Of course there will be those who claim that their GW god does exist. They will claim that their GW god will cause all non believes to drown when he causes the seas exceed 4000 feet in depth above the highest point on Earth. He will laugh at the stupidity of man.Of course we need to be careful of what we do, but leave the crisises to science fiction and take care of business properly....Show more
Esteban Lyson: No. People who ! try to claim that clearly don't know anything about global warming, so we know that anyone who suggests that has a meaningless opinion on the subject.
Pamela Meno: Texas is not going to secede. It no longer has massive oil reserves and doesn’t have the resources to be a stand-alone country. This secession talk is just that â€" talk,I think Texans are fed up with many of our government's policies. But who isn't?
Hope Lundmark: You are sorely misunderstood. In fact I'm going to call you stupid right now, because you and your dumass cons don't have a freakin clue. Ok, now that it's off my chest, I can continue. The only thing that will disprove global warming is our future. There is no way to prove or disprove because we haven't seen the worst, yet. Just because it snows or doesn't has nothing to do with it. It's called climate change, Winter will not be cancelled this year....Show more
p>Comment jouer avec votre chat avec une souris jouet ? La plupart des propriétaires de chat, laisseront simplement leur chat jouer avec une souris de jouet de chat sur ses propres, cependant, ce n’est pas la meilleure manière d’aller autour de lui. Certains chats s’ennuieront avec les souris et ne sauront pas quoi en faire une fois qu’ils les auront poussées plusieurs fois sur le sol. Voici quelques conseils pour que votre chat adore jouer avec sa souris jouet ! Alors lisez ce qui suit……
Commencez par attacher une ficelle à la tête ou au corps de la souris. (Si ce n’est pas possible, attachez la corde à la queue de la souris. Pas le bout de la queue !)
Le résultat est que votre chat sera heureux de jouer avec les souris de chat et ne s’ennuiera pas.
Une fois que vous avez obtenu le premier couple de souris de chat, vou! s serez en mesure de voir laquelle des souris de jouet de chat votre chat aime le mieux !
Le truc pour éviter que votre chat ne s’ennuie d’un jouet souris chat pour chats, c’est d’échanger occasionnellement les souris chat avec de nouvelles souris chat excitantes !
Lancez la souris du chat sur le sol, quelque part devant votre chat, mais pas trop près !
Maintenant que vous avez commencé un jeu, plus vous vous éloignerez, plus votre chat poursuivra le jouet de souris de chat.
Si votre chat saute par surprise, comme la plupart des chats le font, éloignez la souris de son jouet.
Après cela, il sera facile de déterminer quel chat jouet souris à obtenir pour votre chat.
Cela signifie, que si vous achetez quelques souris de jouet de chat, vous pouvez laisser votre chat jouer avec une souris de chat, jusqu’à ce qu’elle s’ennuie et lui donner alors une souris différente de chat pour jouer avec.
Une fois que votre ch! at s’approche, tirez simplement le jouet de souris de chat l! oin d’elle encore une fois !
La meilleure chose à faire au début, c’est de choisir un couple de souris pour votre chat.
Tirez un peu, puis arrêtez. Juste assez pour éveiller la curiosité de votre chat.
Quel genre de souris de jouet de chat devriez-vous choisir pour votre chat ?
Lindsey Zanardi: I think you have to ask why would they want to “hide the decline,†or why it is a “travesty“ that the evidence does not point to the conclusion they want. Why would they want to “hide the decline†unless it is counter to an agenda that would benefit someone if there was no decline? Because as far as what is supposedly best for the earth; and if global warming is as devastating as alarmists want us to believe; then shouldn’t they be rejoicing in the fact that the global temperature is in decline rather than increasing? And how could this good news that the globe is not overheating be a travesty? Shouldn’t they be happy about the data showing steady or declining temperatures? This is the most condemning of their point of view: that they would prefer to have the facts show an increase so that their precious theory would be correct, regardless of whether or not it is what is good for earth or humans. It is clear that they have an agenda they w! ant to move forward regardless of facts, and their motivation is not based in any concern for what is best for humankind. It’s ironic you ask “how does this will affect the global temperature record†because the record is simple factual data â€" unaffected by the opinions or conclusions of scientists who have many times in the past misinterpreted facts. That’s not a criticism â€" we are human and prone to mistakes and shortsightedness. So why won’t they release the raw data? If the raw data is available to everyone, then those who understand science can analyze it and there will be not fudged conclusions hidden in mysterious computer models. Are they so arrogant as to think other scientists are not capable of analyzing the raw data correctly? They were clearly trying to hide something, and it’s safe to assume that it’s because the conclusion they have foisted upon the world is not supported by the data.
Hollis Demasters: The theory of man made global war! ming says the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere from burning f! ossil fuels will increase the global climate. There is nothing in the theory which says it will allow for a cooling climate.This is another example of how the actual data does not conform to the theory. The global warming theory is a lie and unfortunately for the AGW proponents, the actual data has not ever supported the theory....Show more
Moira Woodrow: Nope. It is what they are selling. Bernie Sanders declares global warming is real, it is caused by man, and we are already seeing disastrous consequences.Now they are trying to have it both ways, and claiming that since CO2 traps heat, you must accept their entire agenda. However, you have to establish so much more. That the extra CO2 is caused by man in the first place. That the amount of warming from man is higher than the natural amount. That would get you to 'anthropogenic'.Then you have to establish that the warming would be harmful. That the harm would outweigh the benefits. That the policies to counter! the warming would not be too costly. Since that last one is impossible, that is why you have to show 'catastrophic', so that the benefits of action outweigh the costs....Show more
Daria Verfaillie: And the deletion of data because of a Freedom of Information Act Request?Surely that had a scientific purpose too. I'm sure he stepped down because he is innocent. That always happens when there is a reasonable explanation. NOT.
Davina David: global warming warms the earth.
Star Gollnick: Global warming is increasing temperature. Just as the name suggest.Your friend is thinking about global dimming, where the temperature is lowering.
Jinny Dronen: 1. Well, I don't see how adding real temps (actual measured temperatures) could ever be considered fraud.2. I'm fairly sure this is still about the tree ring problem.Almost all the "questionable" emails relate to the fact tree rings stop correlating with the temperature in the 1960's, and they don't know why.
Lorine Helwick: The oceans are an engine the warm water flows from! the equator towards the poles. The air cools the water in the northern latitudes and it sinks to the bottom where it is drawn back to the equator. Stall this engine by melting the polar caps. Super cells will form and it will block out the sun for longer than usual periods and we will have more severe winters.
Dexter Dicostanzo: I googled Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change and got 436,000 hits ther majority were not from deniers.That makes it clear to me it is not a denier term.
Mark Hovanes: A lot of words that fail to cover the lack of a site which mentions your 20m, could it be you don't have one.
Teodoro Lamond: These are the kinds of questions true skeptics would be asking. Unfortunately, those (George Will for example) drooling over stolen emails of scientists looking for dirt do not have any interest in determining context. They are the polar opposite of what true skeptics are.Your first series of questions are answered nicely here:h! ttp://www.skepticalscience.com/Hockey-stick-diver...Your second series of questions are largely answered here:http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/trenberth.pa...This refers to the CERES measurements and short-term trends."In this paper we have assembled the available informationon the global energy balance for recent years.Many components of the Earth system play some role,and their monitoring is improving but falls short of what isrequired. Although one climate requirement is forabsolute accuracy whereby observations are linked tobenchmark measurements, as is extensively discussedin a workshop report [46,47], a more achievable goal isto have continuity and overlapping measurements thatare stable in time, thereby allowing changes to be tracked.Hence observations need to be taken in ways that satisfythe Global Climate Observing System climate monitoringprinciples and ensure long-term continuity and that havethe ability to discern small but persistent signals [48]."
K! alyn Proietto: GLOBAL WARMING MEANS JUST THAT. THE EARTH IS HEATING UP,! SLOWLY AND CONTROLED, BUT NOT BY ANYTHING MAN MADE OR NATURE MADE BUT NATURE FORCED.
Jerald Florence: How can the warmers keep presenting an unproven theory as fact?
Gabriel Realmuto: Didn't see this when it was posted, followed a link from one of your other answers.1.Nature is a scientific journal of course. This email has to do with tree-ring proxy data which shows radical temperature drops after 1960 that do not matched the observed "real temps." The trick is to substitute the observed temperature for the proxy data. The problem with the decline is that if their proxy does not match observed current temperatures, why would anyone believe that it accurately reflects temperatures from before we can observe them. The trick makes the proxy look accurate when it is not. The tree ring proxies are vital to the "hockey stick" graph which shows that the current mild warming trend is unprecedented, and tries to erase previous climactic events like the little ice age ! and the medieval warm period.2. If you read the email here: http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=104... it is clearly in response to media reports that global warming has ended, or at least paused. In particular it's about a BBC report, which they seemed to view as a betrayal, though they did claim it was "not outrageously biased." Any spin about heat balances takes it out of the original context.
Isreal Kochheiser: "That's all we need to know about it." Well, that about sums up the level of understanding in the denier camp. Once again, they have shown their true worth by failing to answer your question. I used to try and get scientific answers out of them in here as well and usually ended up with drivel pulled of "think tank" sites funded by Exxonmobil.Even worse was the drivel that sounds like the exaltations that come from 6000year bible history believers.
Mitzie Clough: Global warming is causing the earth's temp to increase. And due to that, the ! polar bears will become extinct since the polar ice caps are all meltin! g.
Sheldon Lally: You seem to prove my point unless you can provide one science related link that says oceans are going to rise 20m you are simply making the same unsupported statements ritchie is making. The official estimates I have seen on various sties use figures between 0.5 to 2m the higher figure is just a tenth of your 20m number.
William Vickerman: I think we can all safely conclude that those who say it is just a denier word are admitting that they know it our CO2 hasn't been catastrophic and probably never will be so there is no reason to enact their idiotic political solutions. Wanting solutions for non-problems is the mark of an idiot or a liar. Since I love science and want to protect from these hacks, it is important to demonstrate who they really are and what they seek. It certainly has nothing to do with science, facts, decency, or reality....Show more
Collin Pelfrey: James always says this is just a "denier" term as well. It makes no! sense to me. They are talking about a large regressive tax and globally tens of TRILLIONS spent to move away from fossil fuels. If they are not talking about catastrophic, then how can they possibly justify this large of an expenditure. Of course the ones who know the data and have to argue with people like ourselves that also know the data, what to avoid talks of catastrophe, because this data supporting catastrophe is extremely lacking. Still, to pretend that catastrophe is a "denier" term is incomprehensible. https://www.edf.org/climate/climate-facts-dangers-...http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/climate-...http://www.climateemergencyinstitute.com/catastrop...http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/october/susan-r...When the warmers pretend that us "deniers" are saying catastrophe, they are CLEARLY LYING. When they pull this crap of lying about catastrophe and lying about who is even saying catastrophe, I have to wonder why they think we should trust them. They seem ! to think that it is the millions spent by Big Oil that causes this dist! rust. Millions is nothing compared to the billions spent on AGW advertisement. How many HBO specials say no warming or minimize climate change? How many TV shows? How many advertisements? I haven't seen ANY. The alarmunists should take note here. The reason why millions are beating out billions in convincing people is because their dishonesty. How long do they really think they can yammer on about catastrophe with no one seeing catastrophe???What is more disconcerting to me is that there are three or four climate scientists that come here frequently. Two of these (Gary F and James) tend to show such a LARGE bias as to try to pretend "deniers" are saying what their side is actually saying. This level of bias really concerns me about how climate scientists treat the data and their methods of avoiding bias. You add to that, the KNOWN modifications or "corrections" to the data which most all seem to show more warming and I start to not only wonder about their predictions! , but their claims on the current temps. Heck, I started believing in AGW. Then I started notice that some of the claims struck me as off, so I looked into the extreme claims. I found those false and started looking deeper. The deeper I looked the more clear it became that this field of science is falling victim to the bandwagon effect....Show more
Glynda Darrin: It warms up the temperature. Your friend is bogus lol
Jill Thomer: If you're talking about environmental conservation 'scientists', let them actually try to prove something with valid research instead of half-truths, hysterical prophecies, and lies. Taking on big business should be a slam-dunk but because conservation-minded scientists have shunned their roles as truth seekers and presenters of unbiased facts in favor of activism they've willfully shed their own credibility for the 'cause'. The cause should be the truth, not winning their side of the debate at all costs. If they did that, there could! be meaningful dialogue that leads to real global action to control pol! lution and hopefully secure the Earth's biosphere, if that's even possible for humans to do.Alas, unfavorable scientific data is minimized or even deliberately hidden by the eco-warriors and the truth therefore becomes lost and obscured. These fools make big business and big polluters look more legitimate with their own propagandizing and they inadvertently slow progress to a crawl, or worse, send us down the wrong path entirely. Just give people the facts and spare us the idiotic posturing and lying; we'd expect that from faceless corporations driven by profit. REAL scientists provide REAL facts and data to validate and prove their theories. Conservationists just don't seem to do that and many people who actually care about the environment, as I do, tune them out with the rest of the white noise. Folks should worry about little things they can do themselves rather than clamor for a magic bullet from snake oil salesmen....Show more
Booker Moros: Pretty much (or its mo! re common version CAGW). You will find very few science realists using it. Raisin Caine says that he doesn't understand why I say that, but then look at his references, he doesn't come up with anyone that actually uses either CACC or CAGW. Deniers are the ones that use those terms.That doesn't mean that we don't expect that catastrophes will occur with AGW, but "catastrophe" has different meanings to different people and isn't even close to being a scientific term, so it's best to leave it out of the descriptive term for the phenomenon....Show more
Foster Koopmann: I have to address this to the person that believes that the greenhouse gasses wear away the ozone layer.You are confusing two myths. The Ozone Layer Myth and the Man Made Global Warming Myth.Long ago, there were so-called scientists that believed the ozone layer was being depleted by flourocarbons. Everybody believed these little windbag scientists and we had to change the way we refrigerate everything! . Now they admit they were wrong. But now we use far more energy to r! efrigerate things because of their bogus claim. Isn't that ironic for the environment?This was long before the Global Warming scare. Ozone layer is not related to greenhouse effect. The Global Warming scare has to do with greenhouse gasses (which also include water vapor, so stop taking showers).Lately, many people maintain that the earth is being overheated by the fact that we are putting out too much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This is a false assertion since it is in fact getting cooler in the past 10 years. Also, the amount of carbon dioxide that people put out is less that 2% of what nature contributes. Use common sense. Understand that global warming is now a get rich quick scheme for major corporations....Show more
Hobert Dula: Recently a large number of emails and documents were hacked from climate scientist's computers. Many skeptics are quoting excerpts from the emails and stating these prove global warming doesn't exist. Two excerpts in parti! cular have been frequently cited. Could the skeptics please explain, in context, the meaning of these excerpts?1) "I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."• What is Nature• What does the term 'trick' mean in this context• What is being referred to by 'real temps'• Which series have they been added to• What decline are they trying to hide• How does this affect the global temperature record• Which aspects of climate science have been called into question2) The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't• To what is the term 'lack of warming' being applied• What point or period in time does 'moment' refer to• What is the wider context of this statement• How does this affect the global temperature record• Which aspects of climate science have been called into questionIn reaching a conc! lusion based on these emails, the sizeable number of skeptics who have ! referenced them must understand both their content and the context. I am therefore confident that many skeptics will provide excellent answers to the questions I have raised and be able to provide credible references or links to validate their responses....Show more
Phil Kuarez: I see catastrophic used by magazines such as the Telegraph and advocacy groups such as Greenpeace. I google catastrophic climate change in Google Scholar and got very few papers with that term in the title. The papers that had that term in the title were in economic journals. Catastrophic has a specific meaning for insurance. There were a few science studies but the term was used for a specific location and event (eg the catastrophic collapse of a lake ecosystem; the catastrophic collapse of the West Antarctic ice shelf). I think it is quite possible that the term would come to mind for many laypeople when reading about potential SLR. That doesn't mean the scientist investigating SLR us! e the term. I've only encountered the term CAGW from a contrarians. The word scientists seem to focus on is Anthropogenic to highlight the role fossil fuel emissions play. This word implies we can act. Perhaps the use of Catastrophic by contrarians is intended to divert us from the word Anthropogenic....Show more
Luis Mellon: It's almost like they have no real understanding of what they are talking about.
Riley Migl: Dishonesty has it's own spirit.Why would people have multiple accounts on yahoo and use them to try to prove a point?Could it be because they are gasping for their last breath?Is their desperation not a sign that they are dishonest at the core?And isn't this vitally necessary desperation proof that their movement is at an end?
Foster Koopmann: Because they're driven by politics. They really have no interest whatsoever in science, facts, or reality. All they care about is "winning", where "winning" means preventing any sort of government ! action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Just like politicians, deni! ers don't care if they have to lie and cheat to "win". To them, the ends always justify the means.
Houston Venezia: We are not the deniers. YOU are the deniers of reality and the accepters of demonic logic as fact. We are not going to allow you to rule the world, nor are we going to adhere to your ridiculous blatherings or instructions on how to deal with a problem that is fake.And even if you believe otherwise, then too bad for you.
Jonathon Labonne: Global warming is most definitely raising the Earths temperature. Scientists are however in debate as to exactly how much it has risen and will continue to rise. Global warming has been caused by a major increase in greenhouse gases which are invisible gases destroying the earth's ozone. The ozone is an invisible layer in the Earth's atmosphere which helps retain heat but also helps prevents the sun's harmful from entering the atmosphere. The greenhouse gasses wear away this layer of protection and more heat becom! es trapped in the atmosphere causing the Earth's overall temperature to rise....Show more
Giovanna Cramblit: It was originally called 'global warming' because the increased level of CO2 and other green house gases trap more of the suns energy, raising the temperature of the atmosphere. On average the earths average temperature will rise. But the effects are much more complex, some places on earth will get warmer, some cooler. So the new term is 'climate change'. Its real, and very scary. We must do everything we can to slow the change.
Kate Baune: No.We can start with those well-known deniers: Greenpeace: "... we need to act to avoid catastrophic climate change." http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaig...Most of these 17,000 links to Google Scholar also need to be examined: https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=catastrophi...Or loyal friend Osama bin Laden: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-binladen-cli...Or New Scientist: "We’re set for c! atastrophic climate change that ...": https://www.newscientist.com/arti! cle/dn28393-how-t..."The climate change science presented here (including the IPCC) is agreed that global climate change can be catastrophic, abrupt and irreversible." http://www.climateemergencyinstitute.com/catastrop..."Pacific Standard’s “Catastrophic Consequences of Climate Change†is an aggressive, year-long investigation into the devastating effects we can expect from anthropogenic global warmingâ€"and how scholars, activists, diplomats, and legislators can help stave off its most dire consequences." http://www.psmag.com/series/cccc-303Even the IPCC gets in on the act: "Risk of catastrophic or abrupt change" https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/..."if we are to efficiently manage the catastrophic impacts of climate change" https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/press/UNEP_Opening_Stateme...The Climate Emergency Institute makes the following point: "Scientists in general avoid using the term climate catastrophe or even dangerous climate change.""The scientists refe! r to climate catastrophe as 'rapid temperature increase' , 'abrupt' global climate change, 'irreversible' climate change impacts, and 'large scale singularities'. The IPCC AR4 did refer to catastrophes in the technical report."So, if a scientist mentions one of the above note that he or she is using a euphemism for catastrophic climate change. They are expressing the meaning without actually saying the words. That still counts in my book....Show more
Brian Marquina: "Global warming" started out as "global cooling." We have since learned that the Earth's temperature doesn't go up forever or down forever -- it cycles up and down like everything else.Because of this, global cooling (global warming) supporters are switching to the term "climate change," so they can use it whether the Earth is warming or cooling.Yes, it's a sham.(edit) Global warming/cooling supporters predicted that the Earth would get warmer and warmer from 1998-2008. They were completely wrong. If th! ey can't get the numbers right for ten years out, then why should we tr! ust their estimates for one hundred years out?...Show more
Phillip Modafferi: I can't answer your questions, but I will say this about the hacked emails and what they mean, even though nobody asked me to. Claiming that these emails prove that climate change is not occurring is idiotically illogical. It's like claiming that God does not exist because some priests fondled altar boys.That's the bottom line-and I know there are any number of people who liken belief in AGW to a religion and can probably think up clever tricks to link abusive priests with AGW believers which they will chalk up as some sort of 'victory,' but that really wouldn't have any bearing on the fractured logic imposed-once again-by those who fancy themselves knowledgable...or even experts...in the field of climate science and pronounce conclusions that make no sense to anyone, except for themselves and their equally illogical brethren.From my point of view, there are plenty of issues to contend wit! h when it comes to climate change, and science needs to research, review and analyze, again and again, the data that has and is being assembled. It is and should be a concern when some scientist are caught seeming to fudge the data, but claiming the emails 'debunk' AGW, etc, etc, is simply......moronic.I personally think the proponents of AGW should give hints about the problems with the research to date in the hope that some intelligent discourse about climate science and it's implications environmentally, geopolitically and economically would develop. I for one am delighted when interesting and relevant questions and comments arise from those with whom I might disagree wholeheartedly and have been pleased to read some very interesting observations about the implications of the hacked emails, but this stuff about global warming being 'proven' to be a hoax because of them is nothing but baloney and wishful thinking. Or lack of same.
Horace Escue: Can I play? We a! ll know deniers can't answer these questions.1) Nature is a peer-review! ed scientific journal. One of the most respected in the world."Trick" is being used in the context like "that's a neat trick". In this context, it means a way to solve a problem."Real temps" refers to the instrumental temperature record, which we know is accurate.They've been added to Briffa's tree ring global temperature reconstruction.They were hiding the decline in global temperatures since the 1960s in this tree ring data, known as the "divergence problem" because as we know from the instrumental temperature record, global temperatures rose rapidly over this period.This doesn't affect the global temperature record, it merely reflects it more accurately.No aspects of climate science should be called into question by this email.2) The "lack of warming" refers to the fact that we know from satellite and ocean heat content changes that the Earth's energy imbalance is ~0.9 W/m^2, but we don't know where all of this energy is going. A small percentage is going into surface! air temperatures."At the moment" means we can't account for the energy imbalance with current data.The wider context is that the planet is unquestionably warming. The specific question is how much of that warming is going into heating the air, heating oceans, melting ice, etc.This has no affect whatsoever on the temperature record.This doesn't call any aspects of climate science into question, except perhaps we should put more funding into instrumentation to monitor where the Earth's energy imbalance is going.
Rosalba Lingner: There is the lack of understanding, but many simply have no qualms about lying to try and get what they want. They remind me of Ahmadinejad, who, although quite educated, is continually using the "Big Lie."
Virgil Menefee: Global warming causes global cooling, forest fires, anthropogenic plate tectonics, tsunamis, tornacanes, tornacadoes, water spouts, boll weevils, killer bees, humidity, magnetic field variations, dust storms, and rust ! spots in my rose garden.
Bianca Lannier: We have one anonymous do! nor who states, "this is a denier term intended to ridicule reality (sic)."https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20160...Is this true?...Show more
Sook Hershkowitz: I have to say, skeptics rule!!I am not a denier of Climate Change, but I also do not accept that anthropogenic climate change has been proven. There are scientists who believe they have data/theories/evidence to support both sides of the argument.There are also scientists on both sides of te Big Bang Theory. You will even find scientists who will support a high carb/low protein diet as healthy, as well as the opposite.The fact that scientists disagree over climate change does not make it fake, false, a lie, misrepresented, it just makes it the same as almost any field of scientific inquiry.My personal choice is to err on the side of caution. If we each take responsibility for planting more trees, using less fossil fuel, eating and using locally grown products, we sill see OTHER benefits as well ! as the possible mitigation of any anthropogenic climate change....Show more
Terrell Voltz: Here's the way I understand it.The "nature trick" is the smoothing interpolation subroutine used to massage the data. Not in itself a deception. However, the extra step in the interpolation of interjecting a set of fixed numbers makes it appear as though the data smoothing forced the numbers into the famous "hockey stick" graph. And as I understand it if random numbers are fed into the program instead of temperature data 9 out of 10 times you will get a hockey stick graph. That is troubling to say the least about a computerized climate model we are counting on to set policy. This is also the "series of numbers being added to the actual climate data.The "real temps" and "hide the decline" refer to the use of tree ring data to calculate estimated historical temperatures. The problem arises from about 1960 or 61 when the tree ring data starts to diverge from the actual temper! ature readings. This is the decline that I really believe they are ref! erring to the calculated decline based on tree ring data. Rather than fix the calculations it appears they merely manually loaded in actual temperature readings. Sure that improved the accuracy of their report but at the same time it concealed not only the tree ring decline but the failure of their computerized climate model to accurately reconstruct temperature data.The "lack of current global warming" was the biggest failure of the computerized climate model. According to the model the rate of temperature increase should be directly proportional to the concentration of CO2. The problem was that actual temperatures were not increasing at the rate predicted by the model. It was clear from the actual data that the relationship between CO2 concentration and mean global temperature was more complicated than the computer model and that the current climate model was incorrectly predicting that current temperatures should be higher than they were. That's a big problem it me! ans that the same model used to predict a global castastrophy was incorrect.Aspects called into question.1. It is clear the current computerized climate model is a joke. It is not even correctly predicting current temperatures so it is obviously flawed. So I question the accuracy of the current computerized climate model.2. I question the honesty of the current group of "scientist" conducting the investigation. They seemed more concerned about the political aspects than scientific aspects. Instead of issuing a statement that there is something wrong with their current model and they need to fix it, they manually inserted data, destroyed raw data, and conspired to silence opposing views, and refused to release data and the computer code for their model. None of those actions is very scientific but more typical of government bureaucrats pushing an agenda....Show more
Sharron Salin: What Mike L says... they have been around and will always be around. The average temperature of the globe is always ocillating... to say that the globe is getting warmer is a true statement, but to say that it is a consequence of human activity is not necessarily true. If you were to look at the average temperature of the earth's climate over the last million years, you would have a graph that looks like a sine graph. At some points, the average temperature is much colder than one would expect. It is just a naturally occuring cycle. Global warming is NOT due to damage to the ozone layer. In 500 years, we will be facing another cooling cycle, and panic over an impending ice age will likely ensue....Show more
Jestine Osumi: Global warming, the human part of it, is the term used to describe the overall and average increase in the Earth’s temperature. As the world warms up heatwaves are becoming more frequent and more intense.So far the planet has warm! ed by a little under 1°C, this might not sound a lot but in climatic terms it is very significant and the effects of a seemingly small change are quite dramatic.A European study by the meteorological office of Switzerland (MeteoSuisse) found that the number of days on which heatwaves occur has nearly trebled and that heatwaves now last twice as long as they did back in 1880 when global weather records were first maintained.http://www.agu.org/news/press/pr_archives/2007/200... These heatwaves are becoming more extreme. Earlier this year we witnessed the second deadliest heatwave ever recorded when large parts of Russia was gripped for several weeks by intense heat. The worst heatwave ever occurred just seven years ago and claimed up to 52,000 lives in Europe.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Northern_Hemisph... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_European_heat_wa... Regarding the above answers: The destruction of the ozone layer is something different to global warming, th! ere are some links but it’s not the cause of the heatwaves. ! The argument that heatwaves are nothing new is true â€" they have always occurred, but at nowhere near the frequency and intensity as has been the case in recent decades....Show more
Salvador Prchlik: heat waves changes environment conditions adversely.
Dulcie Edis: Heatwaves are not new . They've been around millions of years .
p>Si vous constatez que votre voiture ne démarre pas, il y a un certain nombre de problèmes qui peuvent en être la cause. Les trois principales catégories que vous devriez d’abord aborder sont le démarreur et la batterie, l’alimentation en carburant et l’allumage. Il y a de fortes chances que si votre véhicule ne démarre pas, le problème se situe quelque part dans cette courte liste. Commencez à réduire les problèmes possibles afin de déterminer ce que vous devez faire pour réparer le véhicule.
Ajoutez du carburant si le véhicule est en panne d’essence. Si le véhicule est extrêmement pauvre en carburant ou en panne d’essence, ajoutez-en à l’aide d’un contenant de gaz en plastique rouge conçu pour transporter et verser l’essence dans le réservoir du véhicule. L’essence se nourrit de nombreux type! s de plastique, il est donc très important d’utiliser un contenant destiné à son transport. Vissez la buse sur la grande ouverture de la boîte, puis ouvrez le bouchon du reniflard de l’autre côté avant de verser l’essence dans votre véhicule.
Vérifiez les bornes de la batterie. Ouvrez le capot du véhicule et vérifiez les connexions entre la batterie et le moteur. Il y a deux bornes (positive et négative) et les deux doivent avoir des connexions métal sur métal propres afin de transmettre suffisamment d’électricité. Vérifiez que les deux câbles sont connectés et que les bornes ne sont pas recouvertes de débris ou d’oxydation.
Recherchez les signes de secousses lorsque vous conduisez avant qu’il ne meure. Un signe courant de problème avec le système d’alimentation en carburant de votre véhicule est une secousse ou une puissance irrégulière lorsque vous conduisez à une vitesse constante, par exemple sur l’autoroute. Si vous ! commencez à sentir que le moteur délivre une puissance inter! mittente alors que votre pied reste au même endroit sur l’accélérateur, c’est peut-être à cause d’un problème de débit de carburant.
Testez le solénoïde du démarreur. Si le saut au démarrage de la voiture n’a pas fonctionné, il peut y avoir un problème avec le démarreur ou le solénoïde. Commencez par tester le solénoïde du démarreur à l’aide d’une lampe témoin. Touchez la lampe témoin à la borne inférieure de l’électro-aimant et mettez le câble négatif à la terre sur la carrosserie du véhicule. Demandez à un ami d’essayer de démarrer le véhicule pour voir si le solénoïde s’enclenche.
Vérifiez si le véhicule redémarrera après quelques minutes. Si le moteur s’arrête pendant que vous conduisez et qu’il a du mal à démarrer ou à tourner immédiatement après, essayez de le laisser reposer pendant quelques minutes et essayez à nouveau. Si le moteur démarre et tourne correctement après une vingtaine de ! minutes d’inactivité, cela peut être dû à un filtre à carburant bouché.
Écoutez le véhicule lorsque vous essayez de le démarrer. Le problème le plus facile à diagnostiquer lors du démarrage de votre véhicule est souvent une batterie à plat. Lorsque vous tournez la clé de contact, écoutez le bruit que fait le moteur lorsqu’il essaie de démarrer. S’il n’émet aucun son, il se peut qu’il s’agisse simplement d’une pile à plat.
Vérifiez que vos bougies d’allumage ne sont pas endommagées. Utilisez une douille de bougie d’allumage pour retirer les bougies d’allumage de votre moteur et examinez-les pour diagnostiquer les problèmes qui peuvent exister. Retirez chaque bouchon et inspectez-les pour déceler les types spécifiques de dommages qui pourraient indiquer ce qui empêche le moteur de démarrer.
Remplacez les bougies d’allumage si nécessaire. Si les bougies d’allumage semblent être encrassées, vous devrez régl! er le problème à l’origine de l’encrassement afin de faire tourne! r le moteur correctement. Remplacez les bougies d’allumage endommagées par des bougies neuves.
Vérifiez les fils de la fiche. Assurez-vous que chacun des fils de la bougie d’allumage est solidement fixé à la bougie et à la bobine d’allumage. Vous pouvez également utiliser un ohmmètre pour effectuer un test de résistance des bougies d’allumage afin de vous assurer que les fils des bougies transmettent suffisamment d’électricité aux bougies d’allumage pour allumer le mélange air et carburant dans le moteur.
Essayez de faire démarrer le véhicule. Si les câbles de la batterie sont bien fixés, utilisez un autre véhicule pour démarrer le moteur. Connectez les deux batteries à l’aide de câbles cavaliers, en vous assurant d’utiliser le câble rouge sur les bornes positives et le câble noir sur les bornes négatives.
Testez votre pompe à essence. Il y a quelques méthodes que vous pouvez utiliser pour tester votre pompe à essen! ce afin de voir si elle fonctionne correctement. Assurez-vous de vérifier qu’il reçoit du courant électrique, puis effectuez un test de débit pour vérifier le volume de carburant qu’il envoie au moteur.
Remplacez votre filtre à carburant. Il se peut que votre véhicule ne reçoive pas de carburant parce que le filtre à carburant est complètement bouché. Remplacez votre filtre à carburant en le plaçant sous le véhicule et en débranchant les conduites de carburant qui y entrent et en sortent. Retirez le filtre du support et installez-en un nouveau pour permettre au carburant de s’écouler à nouveau dans le moteur.
Testez la batterie. Après avoir vérifié les câbles de la batterie, utilisez un voltmètre pour tester la tension de la batterie. Allumer le voltmètre et toucher le fil positif (rouge) de la borne positive de la batterie, puis toucher le fil négatif de la borne négative. Si la batterie est complètement chargée, il faut lire en! tre 12,4 et 12,7 volts.
Tester les bobines d’allumage. Bien quâ! €™improbable, si toutes vos bobines d’allumage ne fonctionnent pas, cela empêchera le moteur de démarrer. Testez vos bobines d’allumage en retirant une bougie d’allumage et en la reliant de nouveau à son fil. Touchez le métal de la bougie à une pièce de métal dans le compartiment moteur et demandez à un ami de tourner la clé dans le contact.
Fermin Tara: almintaka has the superb answer. so a strategies as macroscopic area, wherein we are residing, is worried, conservation of momentum is inviolate. however, as quickly as you start up off tweeking activities on the limitations of Heisenberg's uncertainty theory, issues are not as tender, and what we evaluate "rules" at the instant are not inevitably real for all time. Any length over those intervals of time and distance isn't attainable with the help of any ability obtainable to us because of the fact any length we would take could exchange the circumstances of what we are observing, and could stress it into the macroscopic international, the place it rather is then compelled to obey the guidelines of our international....Show more
Peggy Sandefer: You would slow down the space ship the same way space ships take off. The law of conservation of momentum states that the sum of momentum in a system does not change over time, expressed mathematically as MiVi=M! fVf Where. M: Mass, V: VelocityInitially, you'll have a single object (space ship) [Mi] moving at a constant velocity [Vi], with the total momentum of the system equal to MiVi. To slow down the space ship, the space ship could launch something in the forward direction. When this happens, the total momentum of the system is equal to Mf1Vf1 + Mf2Vf2, where Mf1 is the new mass of the space ship and Vf1 is the new velocity of the space ship. Mf2 is the mass of the object launched from the space ship and Vf2 is the velocity of the object launched from the space ship. Since we know that, initially, the space ship's momentum is equal to MiVi and that since it's conserved (law of conservation of momentum), MiVi = Mf1Vf1 + Mf2Vf2.We are slowing down the space ship so Vf1 needs to be smaller than Vi. Since this is the case, a greater value for Mf2Vf2 will slow down the ship more because the larger its value, the smaller the value of Mf1Vf1.THEREFORE: To slow down t! he space ship, something needs to be launched from the space s! hip in the exact same direction as the spaceship is currently moving. The faster it is launched or the more mass the projectile has, the more it will slow down the ship. (Keep in mind, the more mass it has, the less mass the space ship will have which actually slows it down less. Increasing the mass of the projectile will slow down the ship more, but not as effectively as increasing the velocity of the object.)As I mentioned before, this is how a rocket takes off. At first it is sitting stationary on the launch pad, then it pushes a great deal of fuel at a high velocity towards the ground, which makes the rocket move in the opposite direction.*Note: V being a velocity means that direction is important, to slow down the ship the object must be launched in the same direction that the ship is moving....Show more
Ronny Dorge: If you are talking about a friction-less atmosphere/environment then you cannot. Otherwise turn the spaceship off? or however you make a spaceship s! top going? but even then it would slow due to friction with the atmosphere.
